Coventry University Business School and EFA Logo

Abstract

This short article contributes to the ongoing discussion on the interdependencies between regional conflicts and global economic stability, offering insights into the multifaceted impacts of the Red Sea crisis on international trade.

The ongoing crisis in the Red Sea, characterised by the Houthi’s attacks on commercial shipping, presents a critical challenge to global trade. This short article examines the potential ramifications of the crisis on international maritime commerce, with a focus on the interplay between geopolitical tensions and global economic dynamics.

Introduction

The Red Sea, a pivotal maritime corridor linking Europe and Asia, has recently become the epicentre of escalating tensions. The Houthi’s attacks on commercial vessels in this region, apparently as a response to Israel attacks on Gaza, have introduced a new dimension of risk to global trade. This situation necessitates an in-depth analysis to comprehend the potential impacts on international trade dynamics.

The Strategic Importance of the Red Sea

The Red Sea holds unparalleled strategic importance in global maritime trade. It is more than just a waterway; it’s a global trade artery. It is the shortest sea route connecting Europe with the Middle East and Asia. The Suez Canal, located at the Red Sea’s northern end, is particularly crucial; about 12% of global trade transits through this channel (DW, 2023). The canal facilitates the movement of approximately 9 million barrels of oil per day, underscoring its vital role in energy transportation (DW, 2023). The disruption of this artery can have far-reaching effects on global supply chains and energy markets.

Disruption and its Economic Implications

The crisis in the Red Sea have had immediate economic repercussions. Shipping companies, faced with escalating risks of hostile attacks, have been forced to reroute their vessels, leading to longer transit times and increased operational costs. The alternative route via the Cape of Good Hope adds about 3,500 nautical miles, equating to significant additional fuel costs and delivery delays. It is estimated that, on average, this route would add US$ 1 million to the fuel cost (DW, 2023). This rerouting has also impacted insurance premiums, with war risk insurance premiums for Red Sea shipments rising sharply (Reuters, 2024). A tangible example of the economic strain is visible in the actions of European manufacturers, like Michelin, which faced production halts due to delays in raw material deliveries (Reuters, 2024). This instance is not isolated, and similar effects are expected to be seen across other trades and businesses. The ripple effect of the crisis is likely to impact various sectors globally, from manufacturing to retail, highlighting the interconnected nature of modern economies and global trade networks.

Short-term and Long-term Global Impacts

In the short term, the crisis has led to a more than threefold increase in container shipping rates on the Asia-Europe route, with rates rising from $1,170 to $4,400 for a standard 40-foot container (ING Think, 2024). This surge in rates will likely impact consumer prices globally, leading to higher costs for a range of imported goods. In the longer term, if the crisis persists or escalates, it could precipitate a fundamental reshaping of global shipping routes and trade patterns. Prolonged instability could drive a shift in the reliance on certain trade corridors, potentially leading to new alliances and trade dynamics. Additionally, extended disruptions could exacerbate existing supply chain issues, further straining the global economy still recovering from the pandemic’s effects (ING Think, 2024).

Geopolitical Ramifications

The crisis has broader geopolitical implications, reflecting the complex interplay between regional conflicts and global commerce. International responses, including naval task forces and diplomatic efforts, underscore the global significance of maritime security in the Red Sea. However, these responses also highlight the delicate balance between safeguarding trade interests and avoiding further escalation of regional tensions.

Conclusion

The Red Sea crisis exemplifies the fragility of global trade in the face of geopolitical instability. It serves as a stark reminder of the interconnectedness of global economies and the need for cooperative international efforts to ensure maritime security. As the situation evolves, the global community must remain vigilant and responsive to safeguard this vital trade artery, underpinning the stability and prosperity of the international economic order.

Lecturer – Chashika Kalubowila

References

1. DW. (2023). Red Sea shipping attacks threaten global trade. Retrieved from www.dw.com.

2. Reuters. (2024). US attacks Houthi anti-ship missiles, vessel hit in Red Sea. Retrieved from www.reuters.com.

3. ING Think. (2024). Red Sea shipping disruption rages on and the impact will continue well into 2024. Retrieved from think.ing.com.

Keywords: Red Sea, Global Trade, Maritime Security, Geopolitical Tensions, International Commerce, Economic Impact.

Skip to content